The Islamic republic of Michigan is thinking about taking Gitmo prisoners

by CynthiaYockey on August 14, 2009

I don’t see anyone in the MSM or blogosphere posting the names of the states with dangerously large populations of Muslims — who will be using democracy to destroy democracy — but Michigan is one of them. Ask Saginaw. And Dearborn.

Now various news reports say Standish, Michigan, has a prison that is about to be closed and the town officials are looking to keep it open by taking prisoners from other states, or the Gitmo prisoners.

Thanks to the MSM refusing to report on the requirements of Islam to convert or kill all non-Muslims — I believe their zeal for the truth is tempered by sincere bomb threats and the examples of actual murders of their more defiant colleagues — most people in the U.S. think Islam is just one more religion to tolerate and that they would be bigots is they thought there is any difference between being a Muslim and being a Methodist.

I can think of seven: taqiyya, jihad, fatwa, sharia, burka, female genital mutilation and honor murders.

Why is no one in Standish considering what friends, family members, colleagues and employees of the terrorists in Gitmo, who have not been allowed contact with their favorite terrorist during his incarceration in Gitmo, but who will be ready, willing and able to move close to him if he is re-located to the United States?

Because I’m thinking there’s more to consider here longterm than boosting the local economy.

Follow conservativelez on Twitter

apodoca August 15, 2009 at 7:55 am

Americans are asleep at the wheel, Cynthia. Islam is not in the U.S. or anywhere to co-exist but to dominate. The plan is to replace the Constitution with Shariah. We cannot afford to allow Michigan to become an Islamic state because of its critical position adjacent to Canada. Once Muslims become the majority in Michigan, they will mount a drive to secede from the union. Muslims in VA and the south and the west will do the same. Then will come the riots and the bombings as a way of cowing Americans into submission. The Hindus respond to Islamic aggression thus: you bomb me? I’m gonna run amok on your ass and kill a few thousand of you.

Jethro August 15, 2009 at 3:17 pm

The local politicians don’t see any “problem” with security for the prison. How short-sighted can they be? Does anyone remember Beslan, Russia? Chechen terrorists took 1100 hostages at a Beslan school to demand the end of the Second Chechen War. Over 300 hostages were killed (186 children). What will happen when a local Standish school is taken over by terrorists to demand the release of the Jihadist prisoners?

Peter August 16, 2009 at 5:33 am

I do not understand why Islam is not hiding in their basements cowering for fear of what we will do. I’m fairly widely known for my general air of kindly humanitarianism but threaten my family and I turn into something else entirely. And I pay government to be frightening so I don’t have to.
.-= Peter´s last blog ..Nothing Much To Say. =-.

Cynthia Yockey August 16, 2009 at 8:43 am


As I expect you learned during your service in Viet Nam, war is not waged in fronts very often any more. Small hate-filled groups like the 9/11 bombers can have an effect far out of proportion to their numbers. And a constant stream of attacks can sap the will of a nation. The problem is that you can’t kill hate by shooting it. So we have an enormous array of weapons designed for frontal wars that can be won by killing people. We do not have many weapons for dissolving hate.

However, there IS a proven technology for creating peace. It is not expensive and does not require an enormous number of people. It is called the Maharishi Effect and I wrote about it here and here when I first started my blog. I should write about it more often since I believe I’m the only person in the conservative blogosphere who understands the phenomenon.


Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: