Carrie Prejean to sue Miss California organization for libel and stuff

Perez Hilton has posted at his Web site an image of the first page of a lawsuit slated to be filed on Friday, July 31, on behalf of Carrie Prejean. Miss Prejean was fired from her position as Miss California USA by pageant owner Donald Trump in June. Now Prejean is suing K2 Productions, which operates the Miss California USA pageant, and the organization’s top executives, Shanna Moakler and Keith Lewis. Prejean alleges slander, libel, boob job disclosure, religious discrimination, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Reached for comment, Prejean told a reporter, “I have a deal for a book about my life that’s supposed to come out in November. My ghost writer is going nuts trying to come up with interesting stuff about me to fill out a whole book even though I talk to him about my life for hours and hours. I thought he had all the material he needs because almost every session ends with him holding himself and rocking back and forth and screaming something about ‘Enough! Enough!’ But the lawyer for the National Organization for Marriage, Charles LiMandri, says if I really want the book to be a bestseller, it needs more drama.

“Charles said I could get back all the headlines I lost when Donald Trump fired me if I sued the Miss California organization,” Prejean said, “so that’s what I’m doing. But I’m not suing Donald Trump even though he said I was being fired for being a two-faced bitch because I can totally make him dump his wife for me. I was raised that the Bible says marriage is one man and one woman, so she would definitely have to go.”

Prejean missed the actual filing of her lawsuit by three hours due to a misunderstanding in which she waited at a Westwood food court texting her friends before learning she was due at the Superior Court House in Los Angeles.

3 replies on “Carrie Prejean to sue Miss California organization for libel and stuff”

  1. Something I don’t understand, Cynthia. You do not agree with Miss Prejean’s stance on gay marriage. Fine. Yet you are angry at what the mainstream media and the Democrats (but I repeat myself) have done to Governor Palin.

    Except that the scale is smaller, just how is your treatment of Miss Prejean different that their treatment of Governor Palin?

    1. Peter,

      For one thing, I went to a press conference with Ms. Prejean and got to see her in action and make up my mind about her character. My impression is that she is only looking out for herself and will say whatever she thinks will advance her own interests. I do not believe she has the capacity for empathy for others. Also, I believe the news reports that her mother is a lesbian. So I think she is selling out her own mother and denouncing her own mother’s right to equality. Ms. Prejean’s modeling agent fired her for the same behavior that got her fired as Miss California. The people who support her are likely to regret it.

      So, in short, I have valid criticisms of Ms. Prejean based on my personal observation in addition to my research.

      The mainstream media AND bloggers largely have been creators and/or purveyors of rumors and falsehoods about Gov. Palin with the intention of destroying both her and her family and demolishing her support. They also have interviewed her with the intention of humiliating and discrediting her. However, my perception of Gov. Palin is that she is intelligent, humble and large-hearted. What I see in her is that her involvement in politics is motivated by her devotion to service and her vision that there are jobs that need to be done to make the world a better place that she is most suited to do. She has a servant’s heart governed by the mind of a brilliant general.

      What’s different is that my treatment of Ms. Prejean is fact-based, while a good deal of the MSM’s treatment of Gov. Palin is based on rumors.

      Cynthia

Comments are closed.