Comments on: 'Please fire Kathleen Parker'

By: Mixed bag from the NY Times today « A Conservative Shemale

Mixed bag from the NY Times today « A Conservative Shemale — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:13:57 +0000

[...] Cynthia Yockey wants Kathryn Parker fired – I tend to agree. [...]

By: Rich Fader

Rich Fader — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:54:50 +0000

To clarify Peter’s post, I assuming he didn’t mean the gov would eat Mses. Parker and Dowd. There are some free-range rude that even Hannibal Lecter wouldn’t eat, let alone Sarah Palin.

By: Steve Poling

Steve Poling — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:26:41 +0000

I think you’ve fingered a key dynamic. Despite all the rhetoric, many powerful woman acquired that power via sleeping with a more powerful man. For Mrs. Palin to achieve success by dint of her own efforts alone must gall those who rose to the top, as you so picturesquely said, “on their backs.” That Mrs. Palin is younger, prettier, smarter, and nicer than these harridans has to be galling. That she’s doing exactly what she wants with her integrity intact has to drive them nuts.

If you’ll excuse a little Baptist malarky, I wonder if guilty consciences contribute to Palin Derangement Syndrome.
.-= Steve Poling´s last blog ..Who is Norah O’Donnell? =-.

By: rose

rose — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:13:58 +0000

As a charter subscriber to MS magazine, a feminist who spent 8 years in the Navy, 10 years of religious study and 15 years of teaching Juvenile Delinquents. Peter hit it on the money. Dowd, Parker and Palin 15 miles from the road. No Question it would be Sarah Palin walking out. In addition, she’d beat out most of Congress in the same situation.

By: Peter

Peter — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:28:56 +0000

Parker and Dowd should not make anyone’s evil list. Now stupid, yes. They are each near the top of the stuupid list. They, like most in the media, are the type that is called smart in school, dumb on the bus.

Unfortunately the education system is failing badly. We’ve managed to ruin a couple of generations now with these new (and obsolete before they were put into practice) ideas. So, we have all these people like Dowd and Parker who can spout off the misinformation they have learned from their betters, or those whom they consider their betters, but cannot think their way of a wet paper grocery sack.

Meanwhile we’ve mangaged to raise a couple of generations of kids that have never cleaned a fish or taken a punch.

Dowd would lose a thinking contest with a toadstool. Parker is slightly smarter, being smart enough to catch and hold a husband who can help her career. She might tie that thinking contest with a turnip.

Did Parker sleep her way to “the top”? I do not doubt that her husband helped. After all, businesses usually consider marriage as a sign of stability. Did his money help? Of course. Whether or not he donated her way in, I have no way of knowing. I do know that having the ability to eat and drink with as well as dress like those people is important if one wants to work with them.

Still, both Parker and Dowd are dim. They like to look down on people like Palin and, for that matter, me. I’d bet money, though, that if you put Sarah, Dowd and Parker down in the forest, fifteen miles from the road, it would be Sarah that would walk out, and she wouldn’t be hungry, either.

By: smitty

smitty — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:46:17 +0000

“number 7 slot for Oprah Winfrey, who is demonstrably more evil than Charles Manson because she used her public platform and our trust to choose Obama as president, while number 8, Charles Manson, has been restricted to a considerably smaller field of influence for decades now due to his unfortunate incarceration”

Wow. Please consider cluebatting me via email when you quote us, just in case my fallible eyes miss it in the RSS reader, Cynthia.
Thanks,
Chrris
.-= smitty´s last blog ..Facts Make Jiggery-pokery Really Arduous =-.