<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yo, Steven Crowder, free speech advocate! &#8212; substitute Obama&#039;s daughters&#039; names in Letterman&#039;s jokes and post THAT on YouTube!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/</link>
	<description>A Conservative Lesbian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  And no, I didn&#039;t get an email from you though I&#039;m not sure why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  And no, I didn&#8217;t get an email from you though I&#8217;m not sure why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Yockey</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Yockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Duke,

OK, they have been deleted. I e-mailed you directly -- didn&#039;t you receive my e-mail? Please let me know. I&#039;m sorry for the distress.

Regarding your comment that my blog is loading slowly, please keep me posted. I removed three of my Amazon widgets to see if that will speed things up. Right now, the thing that seems to slow the site down is the newsfeed because I have so many sites in it. But I really like being able to get a bird&#039;s eye view of them, so I don&#039;t want to trim it. Please let me know if it is loading faster for you now.

Cynthia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duke,</p>
<p>OK, they have been deleted. I e-mailed you directly &#8212; didn&#8217;t you receive my e-mail? Please let me know. I&#8217;m sorry for the distress.</p>
<p>Regarding your comment that my blog is loading slowly, please keep me posted. I removed three of my Amazon widgets to see if that will speed things up. Right now, the thing that seems to slow the site down is the newsfeed because I have so many sites in it. But I really like being able to get a bird&#8217;s eye view of them, so I don&#8217;t want to trim it. Please let me know if it is loading faster for you now.</p>
<p>Cynthia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>URGENT  AND PERSONAL TO CYNTHIA

Cynthia, Please delete my posts #40 and 41 from the &quot;about me&quot; portion of your blog.  It appears they were published without being read.  You&#039;ll understand when you see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>URGENT  AND PERSONAL TO CYNTHIA</p>
<p>Cynthia, Please delete my posts #40 and 41 from the &#8220;about me&#8221; portion of your blog.  It appears they were published without being read.  You&#8217;ll understand when you see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ministeroftruth</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>ministeroftruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>Lettermanzzzz, Lettermanzzzz, you uneducated jerk. Liberals always are right. Conservatives always are wrong. When liberals make homophobic, sexist and racist remarks, they have been misunderstood. When conservatives are misunderstood, they have made homophobic, sexist, and racist remarks. When Bush ran up big deficits, it was bad. When Obama ran up gigantic deficits, it was good. When Bush ran Gitmo it was bad. When Obama ran Gitmo it was good. When Letterman joked about child rape it was good. When Limbaugh suggested he hoped the president&#039;s socialism failed it was bad.

You need to contact your local Ministry of Truth representative. I think Levi can provide you with the address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lettermanzzzz, Lettermanzzzz, you uneducated jerk. Liberals always are right. Conservatives always are wrong. When liberals make homophobic, sexist and racist remarks, they have been misunderstood. When conservatives are misunderstood, they have made homophobic, sexist, and racist remarks. When Bush ran up big deficits, it was bad. When Obama ran up gigantic deficits, it was good. When Bush ran Gitmo it was bad. When Obama ran Gitmo it was good. When Letterman joked about child rape it was good. When Limbaugh suggested he hoped the president&#8217;s socialism failed it was bad.</p>
<p>You need to contact your local Ministry of Truth representative. I think Levi can provide you with the address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lettermanzzzzzzzzzzzz</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>lettermanzzzzzzzzzzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>This is why liberals are such hypocritical maggots these days:

&quot;Liberals generally have to respond to actual sexist or racist jokes and comments, and we don’t have a persecution complex that requires feeding. &quot;

So the only real slights are those liberals suffer, Levi? When a man tells a joke about child rape it is a misunderstanding, and a governor&#039;s defense of her daughters is for political gain, but any claim by your side of racism and sexism is received wisdom? You people will be swept to sea in a few election cycles, and unlike us I see no return for you this time. This dustup has exposed your hypocrisy and soft underbellies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why liberals are such hypocritical maggots these days:</p>
<p>&#8220;Liberals generally have to respond to actual sexist or racist jokes and comments, and we don’t have a persecution complex that requires feeding. &#8221;</p>
<p>So the only real slights are those liberals suffer, Levi? When a man tells a joke about child rape it is a misunderstanding, and a governor&#8217;s defense of her daughters is for political gain, but any claim by your side of racism and sexism is received wisdom? You people will be swept to sea in a few election cycles, and unlike us I see no return for you this time. This dustup has exposed your hypocrisy and soft underbellies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yes, I do understand how the television industry works. Sponsors do not want to buy time on shows that will get them boycotted. Celebrities do not want to appear on shows that will make people hate them and get them boycotted. Those are the spigots we are turning off.&lt;/i&gt;

Look, you&#039;re talking about mobilizing a couple of million boycotters per sponsor before you&#039;d make any sort of impact on Letterman&#039;s ad-buys. This story is already past its expiration date and thus far it&#039;s only been a positive force for Letterman and those who do business with his show. And this isn&#039;t some abstract, faceless company you&#039;re targeting with threats of boycotts, it&#039;s a high-profile celebrity that has one of the biggest jobs in entertainment whose career has spanned generations. Sorry, you&#039;re just not going to make a dent.

&lt;i&gt;The project of moving a huge boulder is futile without the proper tools and knowledge. As Archimedes used to say, give me a lever, a fulcrum, and a place to stand and I can move the world. I am providing people with these tools. Letterman can be fired with the applcation of persistent, consistent effort. Just use my “Get Letterman Fired” Kit for 30 days.&lt;/i&gt;

Well... good luck I guess!

&lt;i&gt;Regarding the sexism: (1) the arrogant and condescending tone in the “shut your brain off” statement, which also was crazy in relation to the facts; (2), the clear belief that Sarah Palin has an evil agenda in defending herself and her daughters; (3), effectively calling me Gov. Palin’s stooge for defending her and her daughters as woman against attacks that are commonly used to intimitate and control women; (4), and really, claiming Gov. Palin was trying to grab headlines by defending herself is both sexist and just plain crazy — you are completely invalidating her humanity with that statement and invalidating her as a person and as a woman. These were all sexist things to do. The positive, non-sexist behaviors are to be courteous and treat women as equals, who certainly have a right to defend themselves from character assassination and the invalidation intended by ridicule.&lt;/i&gt;

1. My &#039;shut your brain off&#039; comment isn&#039;t directed at women, but conservatives, who routinely play stupid to flog silly little stories like this. No politically informed, objective person could reasonably conclude that David Letterman was talking about anyone other than Bristol Palin in that joke. If you didn&#039;t know who Bristol Palin was or that she&#039;s had a baby, you&#039;d have an excuse. Otherwise, you&#039;re being obtuse to serve some political purpose. Be honest - do you seriously think that Letterman was talking about a 14 year old? People have been making jokes about Bristol Palin and her fertility for nearly a year now, you think he just wanted to switch things up to take it do a dark place all of a sudden? Come on, this is a fairly basic logic problem. If 99 out of 99 jokes about a Palin daughter are referring to Bristol, doesn&#039;t it follow that the 100th joke about a Palin daughter would also be in reference to Bristol?

2,3. Sarah Palin clearly does have an agenda, and she&#039;s also quite clearly not interested in defending her daughters as much as she is interested in exploiting them for her own personal political gain. I also don&#039;t think this, um... &#039;issue,&#039; would be important to you if it weren&#039;t for Sarah Palin telling conservatives that it should be important to them. The Republican Party has a very top-down hierarchy - stooge was your word, not mine.

4. Grabbing headlines - it&#039;s what famous people do. It&#039;s especially what politicians do. Sarah Palin saw a confluence of factors that would make her ridiculous conspiracy theory at least partially plausible to a conservative base starving for red meat and did what Sarah Palin does best by making a big deal about it. This is classic Palin - she&#039;s using her 14 year old as a political prop the same way she used her 18 year old and the rest of her family as political props. If anything, her little tantrum is damaging to women, that fable about the boy who cries wolf comes to mind.

Nobody buys it anyway. Dave will stay on no matter what you do.

&lt;i&gt;I do appreciate that you asked. That’s a good sign.&lt;/i&gt;

And thanks for answering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, I do understand how the television industry works. Sponsors do not want to buy time on shows that will get them boycotted. Celebrities do not want to appear on shows that will make people hate them and get them boycotted. Those are the spigots we are turning off.</i></p>
<p>Look, you&#8217;re talking about mobilizing a couple of million boycotters per sponsor before you&#8217;d make any sort of impact on Letterman&#8217;s ad-buys. This story is already past its expiration date and thus far it&#8217;s only been a positive force for Letterman and those who do business with his show. And this isn&#8217;t some abstract, faceless company you&#8217;re targeting with threats of boycotts, it&#8217;s a high-profile celebrity that has one of the biggest jobs in entertainment whose career has spanned generations. Sorry, you&#8217;re just not going to make a dent.</p>
<p><i>The project of moving a huge boulder is futile without the proper tools and knowledge. As Archimedes used to say, give me a lever, a fulcrum, and a place to stand and I can move the world. I am providing people with these tools. Letterman can be fired with the applcation of persistent, consistent effort. Just use my “Get Letterman Fired” Kit for 30 days.</i></p>
<p>Well&#8230; good luck I guess!</p>
<p><i>Regarding the sexism: (1) the arrogant and condescending tone in the “shut your brain off” statement, which also was crazy in relation to the facts; (2), the clear belief that Sarah Palin has an evil agenda in defending herself and her daughters; (3), effectively calling me Gov. Palin’s stooge for defending her and her daughters as woman against attacks that are commonly used to intimitate and control women; (4), and really, claiming Gov. Palin was trying to grab headlines by defending herself is both sexist and just plain crazy — you are completely invalidating her humanity with that statement and invalidating her as a person and as a woman. These were all sexist things to do. The positive, non-sexist behaviors are to be courteous and treat women as equals, who certainly have a right to defend themselves from character assassination and the invalidation intended by ridicule.</i></p>
<p>1. My &#8216;shut your brain off&#8217; comment isn&#8217;t directed at women, but conservatives, who routinely play stupid to flog silly little stories like this. No politically informed, objective person could reasonably conclude that David Letterman was talking about anyone other than Bristol Palin in that joke. If you didn&#8217;t know who Bristol Palin was or that she&#8217;s had a baby, you&#8217;d have an excuse. Otherwise, you&#8217;re being obtuse to serve some political purpose. Be honest &#8211; do you seriously think that Letterman was talking about a 14 year old? People have been making jokes about Bristol Palin and her fertility for nearly a year now, you think he just wanted to switch things up to take it do a dark place all of a sudden? Come on, this is a fairly basic logic problem. If 99 out of 99 jokes about a Palin daughter are referring to Bristol, doesn&#8217;t it follow that the 100th joke about a Palin daughter would also be in reference to Bristol?</p>
<p>2,3. Sarah Palin clearly does have an agenda, and she&#8217;s also quite clearly not interested in defending her daughters as much as she is interested in exploiting them for her own personal political gain. I also don&#8217;t think this, um&#8230; &#8216;issue,&#8217; would be important to you if it weren&#8217;t for Sarah Palin telling conservatives that it should be important to them. The Republican Party has a very top-down hierarchy &#8211; stooge was your word, not mine.</p>
<p>4. Grabbing headlines &#8211; it&#8217;s what famous people do. It&#8217;s especially what politicians do. Sarah Palin saw a confluence of factors that would make her ridiculous conspiracy theory at least partially plausible to a conservative base starving for red meat and did what Sarah Palin does best by making a big deal about it. This is classic Palin &#8211; she&#8217;s using her 14 year old as a political prop the same way she used her 18 year old and the rest of her family as political props. If anything, her little tantrum is damaging to women, that fable about the boy who cries wolf comes to mind.</p>
<p>Nobody buys it anyway. Dave will stay on no matter what you do.</p>
<p><i>I do appreciate that you asked. That’s a good sign.</i></p>
<p>And thanks for answering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There is an offensive, tasteless and racially tinged “joke” making the rounds right now. It goes like this: ‘Question: which Obama family member will be the first crack w…..?.” ‘Answer: It’s a trick question. It was Daddy.’ Now how many of you Lettermen defenders wouldn’t demand that some right-wing radio bloviator be pulled from the air if that joke, which is less offensive than one about rape, were repeated by the host?”&lt;/i&gt;

A couple of things. First - your joke never would have made it past network television censors because it is nothing but an excuse to be racist. Second - David Letterman&#039;s joke wasn&#039;t about rape, it was about two infamously promiscuous people. Third, liberals generally don&#039;t invent hysterical little episodes for the media like this. Liberals generally have to respond to &lt;i&gt;actual&lt;/i&gt; sexist or racist jokes and comments, and we don&#039;t have a persecution complex that requires feeding.

Fourth, if getting banned by a partisan website is any indication that that faction is composed of fascists and bullies, then your side is far worse based on my own experience. I didn&#039;t have to post anything near as incendiary as your dumb little &#039;test&#039; joke to be banned from dozens of conservative blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There is an offensive, tasteless and racially tinged “joke” making the rounds right now. It goes like this: ‘Question: which Obama family member will be the first crack w…..?.” ‘Answer: It’s a trick question. It was Daddy.’ Now how many of you Lettermen defenders wouldn’t demand that some right-wing radio bloviator be pulled from the air if that joke, which is less offensive than one about rape, were repeated by the host?”</i></p>
<p>A couple of things. First &#8211; your joke never would have made it past network television censors because it is nothing but an excuse to be racist. Second &#8211; David Letterman&#8217;s joke wasn&#8217;t about rape, it was about two infamously promiscuous people. Third, liberals generally don&#8217;t invent hysterical little episodes for the media like this. Liberals generally have to respond to <i>actual</i> sexist or racist jokes and comments, and we don&#8217;t have a persecution complex that requires feeding.</p>
<p>Fourth, if getting banned by a partisan website is any indication that that faction is composed of fascists and bullies, then your side is far worse based on my own experience. I didn&#8217;t have to post anything near as incendiary as your dumb little &#8216;test&#8217; joke to be banned from dozens of conservative blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Yockey</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Yockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>Levi,

Yes, I do understand how the television industry works. Sponsors do not want to buy time on shows that will get them boycotted. Celebrities do not want to appear on shows that will make people hate them and get them boycotted. Those are the spigots we are turning off.

The project of moving a huge boulder is futile without the proper tools and knowledge. As Archimedes used to say, give me a lever, a fulcrum, and a place to stand and I can move the world. I am providing people with these tools. Letterman can be fired with the applcation of persistent, consistent effort. Just use my &quot;Get Letterman Fired&quot; Kit for 30 days.

Regarding the sexism: (1) the arrogant and condescending tone in the &quot;shut your brain off&quot; statement, which also was crazy in relation to the facts; (2), the clear belief that Sarah Palin has an evil agenda in defending herself and her daughters; (3), effectively calling me Gov. Palin&#039;s stooge for defending her and her daughters as woman against attacks that are commonly used to intimitate and control women; (4), and really, claiming Gov. Palin was trying to grab headlines by defending herself is both sexist and just plain crazy -- you are completely invalidating her humanity with that statement and invalidating her as a person and as a woman. These were all sexist things to do. The positive, non-sexist behaviors are to be courteous and treat women as equals, who certainly have a right to defend themselves from character assassination and the invalidation intended by ridicule.

I do appreciate that you asked. That&#039;s a good sign.

Cynthia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Levi,</p>
<p>Yes, I do understand how the television industry works. Sponsors do not want to buy time on shows that will get them boycotted. Celebrities do not want to appear on shows that will make people hate them and get them boycotted. Those are the spigots we are turning off.</p>
<p>The project of moving a huge boulder is futile without the proper tools and knowledge. As Archimedes used to say, give me a lever, a fulcrum, and a place to stand and I can move the world. I am providing people with these tools. Letterman can be fired with the applcation of persistent, consistent effort. Just use my &#8220;Get Letterman Fired&#8221; Kit for 30 days.</p>
<p>Regarding the sexism: (1) the arrogant and condescending tone in the &#8220;shut your brain off&#8221; statement, which also was crazy in relation to the facts; (2), the clear belief that Sarah Palin has an evil agenda in defending herself and her daughters; (3), effectively calling me Gov. Palin&#8217;s stooge for defending her and her daughters as woman against attacks that are commonly used to intimitate and control women; (4), and really, claiming Gov. Palin was trying to grab headlines by defending herself is both sexist and just plain crazy &#8212; you are completely invalidating her humanity with that statement and invalidating her as a person and as a woman. These were all sexist things to do. The positive, non-sexist behaviors are to be courteous and treat women as equals, who certainly have a right to defend themselves from character assassination and the invalidation intended by ridicule.</p>
<p>I do appreciate that you asked. That&#8217;s a good sign.</p>
<p>Cynthia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lettermanzzzzzzzzzzzz</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>lettermanzzzzzzzzzzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>You make a fine point here. I actually conducted an experiment on a less totalitarian left-wing website. Forgive me, but for it to work I will have to repeat a bit of offensiveness. I essentially posted the following:

&quot;There is an offensive, tasteless and racially tinged &quot;joke&quot; making the rounds right now. It goes like this: &#039;Question: which Obama family member will be the first crack w.....?.&quot; &#039;Answer: It&#039;s a trick question. It was Daddy.&#039; Now how many of you Lettermen defenders wouldn&#039;t demand that some right-wing radio bloviator be pulled from the air if that joke, which is less offensive than one about rape, were repeated by the host?&quot;

You almost can guess what happened. Not only did the question go unanswered, but after all the vitriol was directed toward me my account was suspended. Free speech advocates, indeed. More like fascists and, as you correctly called them, bullies. This is a fight worth having.

Sharp site here. I&#039;ll be back. In the meantime, keep up the good fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a fine point here. I actually conducted an experiment on a less totalitarian left-wing website. Forgive me, but for it to work I will have to repeat a bit of offensiveness. I essentially posted the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;There is an offensive, tasteless and racially tinged &#8220;joke&#8221; making the rounds right now. It goes like this: &#8216;Question: which Obama family member will be the first crack w&#8230;..?.&#8221; &#8216;Answer: It&#8217;s a trick question. It was Daddy.&#8217; Now how many of you Lettermen defenders wouldn&#8217;t demand that some right-wing radio bloviator be pulled from the air if that joke, which is less offensive than one about rape, were repeated by the host?&#8221;</p>
<p>You almost can guess what happened. Not only did the question go unanswered, but after all the vitriol was directed toward me my account was suspended. Free speech advocates, indeed. More like fascists and, as you correctly called them, bullies. This is a fight worth having.</p>
<p>Sharp site here. I&#8217;ll be back. In the meantime, keep up the good fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/06/17/steven-crowder-free-speech-advocate-substitute-obamas-daughters-names-in-lettermans-jokes-and-post-that-on-youtube/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=1184#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>Cynthia,

I&#039;m not sure you understand how the television industry works. Ratings is everything. If you have ratings, you will have sponsors, and you will have people that will want to be involved in your show. David Letterman&#039;s ratings are going up - that means that he has more to offer advertisers and celebrities, as if an institution like David Letterman needed more to offer those people.

I&#039;m just trying to save you some time here. I know you&#039;re getting some play from the bigger conservative blogs and that must be exciting, but there&#039;s a reason they&#039;re not really pursuing this with any real effort. It&#039;s futile. Dave has been on the air for something like thirty years. You don&#039;t go that long on network television if you&#039;re the kind of comedian that makes rape jokes about kids.

Also, what did I say earlier that was &#039;extremely sexist?&#039; I&#039;m not really worried, I know I&#039;m a solid feminist, I&#039;m just curious about what got under your skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure you understand how the television industry works. Ratings is everything. If you have ratings, you will have sponsors, and you will have people that will want to be involved in your show. David Letterman&#8217;s ratings are going up &#8211; that means that he has more to offer advertisers and celebrities, as if an institution like David Letterman needed more to offer those people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just trying to save you some time here. I know you&#8217;re getting some play from the bigger conservative blogs and that must be exciting, but there&#8217;s a reason they&#8217;re not really pursuing this with any real effort. It&#8217;s futile. Dave has been on the air for something like thirty years. You don&#8217;t go that long on network television if you&#8217;re the kind of comedian that makes rape jokes about kids.</p>
<p>Also, what did I say earlier that was &#8216;extremely sexist?&#8217; I&#8217;m not really worried, I know I&#8217;m a solid feminist, I&#8217;m just curious about what got under your skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

