<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN reporter Susan Roesgen&#039;s fact-checker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/</link>
	<description>A Conservative Lesbian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 02:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=661#comment-543</guid>
		<description>All Lesbians should be Republican.
The more Libertarian we get, the better.
(And I&#039;m NOT a Ron Paul Kool-Aid drinker.)

Best,
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Lesbians should be Republican.<br />
The more Libertarian we get, the better.<br />
(And I&#8217;m NOT a Ron Paul Kool-Aid drinker.)</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: History Matters</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>History Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=661#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Does CNN&#039;s bias really surprise anyone these days? It seems they have really worked hard to prove they are a liberal spokesnetwork. It is especially funny to have them accuse Foxnews of being right-wing. Of the major networks, Fox is by far the most balanced in its coverage.

Try this simple game (you can play it at home with the kids!). Do searches on various news sources for contrasting terms. I first did this using &quot;right-wing&quot; and &quot;left-wing&quot; to test the networks&#039; bias. My theory was that a liberal source is likely to use &quot;right-wing&quot; more often because that side seems odd enough to a left-leaning organization to require a modifier. As a control, I included Rush Limbaugh&#039;s site in the comparison. He makes no secret of being conservative, so if your network&#039;s results are the opposite of Rush&#039;s, what does that tell you?

The results are here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://churchvstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/do-popular-news-sources-lean-left.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Do Popular News Sources Lean Left?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does CNN&#8217;s bias really surprise anyone these days? It seems they have really worked hard to prove they are a liberal spokesnetwork. It is especially funny to have them accuse Foxnews of being right-wing. Of the major networks, Fox is by far the most balanced in its coverage.</p>
<p>Try this simple game (you can play it at home with the kids!). Do searches on various news sources for contrasting terms. I first did this using &#8220;right-wing&#8221; and &#8220;left-wing&#8221; to test the networks&#8217; bias. My theory was that a liberal source is likely to use &#8220;right-wing&#8221; more often because that side seems odd enough to a left-leaning organization to require a modifier. As a control, I included Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s site in the comparison. He makes no secret of being conservative, so if your network&#8217;s results are the opposite of Rush&#8217;s, what does that tell you?</p>
<p>The results are here:<br />
<a href="http://churchvstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/do-popular-news-sources-lean-left.html" rel="nofollow">Do Popular News Sources Lean Left?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extremist Update: Tea Party Edition &#124; The Classic Liberal Blog</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Extremist Update: Tea Party Edition &#124; The Classic Liberal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=661#comment-541</guid>
		<description>[...] CNN reporter Susan Roesgen made a fool of herself on national TV, while James Wolcott gets beclowned! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNN reporter Susan Roesgen made a fool of herself on national TV, while James Wolcott gets beclowned! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toby928</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>toby928</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=661#comment-540</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Ace of Spades” is a slang term for “cunt&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Really?  I need to get out more I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Ace of Spades” is a slang term for “cunt&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Really?  I need to get out more I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Yockey</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Yockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=661#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Um, &quot;a &lt;em&gt;homosexual &lt;/em&gt;pornographic definition of the phrase &#039;teabagging&#039;&quot;? Aren&#039;t enough women cooperative with the practice that it could be just a plain old definition? Seems like common sense to me, but I&#039;m not in a position to know.

Cynthia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, &#8220;a <em>homosexual </em>pornographic definition of the phrase &#8216;teabagging&#8217;&#8221;? Aren&#8217;t enough women cooperative with the practice that it could be just a plain old definition? Seems like common sense to me, but I&#8217;m not in a position to know.</p>
<p>Cynthia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Acosta</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Acosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=661#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Should anyone be even a bit suprised over the fact that every MSM network personality on the air to date are apparently thoroughly familiar with a homosexual pornographic definition of the phrase teabagging?
Cnn will probably give little miss hack a promotion for this flagrant display of blatent anti-fox news anti-capitalist bias. For a so-called journalist to denigrate a competing news network on the air in such a open manner is not only completely unprofessional but pathetically classless. This behavior being displayed by one of their reporters during a live broadcast at an event like this does not do cnn any favors, quite the opposite in fact. They already have a serious image problem concerning their credibility and if they dont want to end up in the same situation as msnbc then not only should this pathetic excuse for a reporter be fired immediately they should also broadcast a live apology for this incident on all if their outlets, ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should anyone be even a bit suprised over the fact that every MSM network personality on the air to date are apparently thoroughly familiar with a homosexual pornographic definition of the phrase teabagging?<br />
Cnn will probably give little miss hack a promotion for this flagrant display of blatent anti-fox news anti-capitalist bias. For a so-called journalist to denigrate a competing news network on the air in such a open manner is not only completely unprofessional but pathetically classless. This behavior being displayed by one of their reporters during a live broadcast at an event like this does not do cnn any favors, quite the opposite in fact. They already have a serious image problem concerning their credibility and if they dont want to end up in the same situation as msnbc then not only should this pathetic excuse for a reporter be fired immediately they should also broadcast a live apology for this incident on all if their outlets, ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Michelle Malkin as of April 16, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</title>
		<link>http://aconservativelesbian.com/2009/04/16/cnn-reporter-susan-roesgens-fact-checker/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Michelle Malkin as of April 16, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aconservativelesbian.com/aclblog/?p=661#comment-537</guid>
		<description>[...] Pelosi.   Michelle Malkin on the tax day tea parties - theblackkettle.blogspot.com 04/16/2009    CNN reporter Susan Roesgen’s fact-checker - aconservativelesbian.com 04/16/2009 by Cynthia Yockey on April 16, 2009 see more pwn and owned [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pelosi.   Michelle Malkin on the tax day tea parties &#8211; theblackkettle.blogspot.com 04/16/2009    CNN reporter Susan Roesgen’s fact-checker &#8211; aconservativelesbian.com 04/16/2009 by Cynthia Yockey on April 16, 2009 see more pwn and owned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

